Palladia, the first drug officially approved for use in treating dog cancer has arrived. This was described in the Dog Cancer Survival Guide by it’s pre-market name, SU11654. Now it’s finally ready for release.
Palladia, made by Pfizer, has been approved by the FDA. It is expected to be available next year. This drug is approved for treating mast cell tumors in the dog.
The fact that this is the first drug approved for dog cancer may be odd for many. What about all those chemotherapy drugs that are used? They are not FDA approved?
Well, the facts are that vets and veterinary oncologists have been using human drugs the whole time. As a matter of fact, many of the drugs we use generally are not FDA-approved for use in the canine.
Why?
It turns out that FDA drug approval is allowed for one species at a time. On top of that, approval is for one disease or problem. In veterinary medicine, we have cats, dogs, birds, rabbits, monkeys, snakes, and so on…many different species, and they all need treatment.
It would take hundred of years and staggering amounts of money to get all our drugs approved for all these different species and diseases.
So vets have “off-label” drug use privileges. Off-label drug use means we can use drugs approved for one species (including humans) freely in other species.
Let’s take a look at some of the facts around Palladia.
Like most of the conventional treatments we use in treating dogs with cancer, the numbers for Palladia are a bit disheartening.
The median duration of objective response (meaning how long the Palladia’s effect lasted on mast cell tumors) was 12 weeks. Yes, 3 months of tumor shrinkage or disappearance is what you can expect. This number is taken from the original study.
After 3 months the cancer came back.
On top of this, not all dogs with mast cell tumors even responded. It turns out that roughly 40% of dog with mast cell tumors will actually respond to the drug, while the majority do not.
This means that while about 40% of the time the cancer either went away or shrank, in the remaining 60% of dogs Palladia had no effect.
Sigh.
If you would like to look at the original data for yourself, here is the link.
This highlights important points.
First, there is a big to do about Palladia. But, the actual statistics are depressing. Interesting contrast between hype and reality.
Second, I think most guardians of dogs afflicted with mast cell tumors would not be jumping for joy at these numbers, in spite of the festivities at Pfizer.
Lastly, this shows how important it is to leap sideways in our efforts to really treat canine cancer.
The more I think about dog cancer, and disease in general, the more I believe early choices are key, long before old age.
I will start addressing how dog cancer does not start in old age, in future posts. Instead, it starts many, many years before hand. We need to start taking steps earlier, much earlier.
Best to all,
Dr D
About the Author
Get Dr. Dressler's Dog Cancer Diet FREE 

{ 161 comments… read them below or add one }
← Previous Comments
Dr. D, although you comment that the effectiveness of palladia only lasts about 3 months, in your opinion do you think there’s a role for it as a pre-surgical neoadjuvant?????
Thanks!!
Dear Jackie,
yes, and based on the information I have received from both clinicians and oncologists, my personal opinion is to consider masitinib also.
Have your vet contact Dr. Albert Ahn at AB Sciences in New Jersey to see if your dog qualifies for the compassionate use program as another option.
Of course, I am partial to the nutraceutical I developed to help as well- Apocaps.
Best,
Dr D
My Jack Russell/Corgi mix had what we thought was a fatty tumor on his side…it got a hard lump in the center after several months which we had removed.. The diagnosis was Low and Intermediate Soft Tissue Sarcoma with narrow margins. Surgery date was 6-10-2010.
My question is what can I do now.. I have read about Palladia… He is on
Expecta antioxidants. Please advise.
I had contact with a woman from Italy who gave her cat masitinib (kinavet). the vet told her never to stop (life long treatment)
Unfortunately her cat died a view weeks after.
I am wondering, if you stop treating with masitinib (I gave masivet to my dog) or Palladia, will the tumors grow back with top speed?? This is the idea I have. We had to stop Masivet to give our dog chemo therapy. The chemo did noting and the tumors grew very fast!
Dr. Demian: I lost a dog earlier to hemangiosarcoma; it was quick and horrible as the splenectomy came too late.
Now I have another probable case, and the vet has mentioned this Palladia. I would like to try it, but I can’t afford $15 per pill every other day. Are there any programs conducted by schools or by Pfizer or independent Foundations whereby I could get it cheaper? Frankly, the money is not there, and I don’t want to let my dog die without trying this drug, even despite the dismal statistics you cite so intelligently.
I have a question. My dog has undifferentiated nasal carcinoma. my dog has been taking palladia for it but not really sure if it’s working or not. per oncologist, they think it’s working. I don’t even know what i wanna ask, i’m so confused and dont know what to do. I’m wondering if continuing with the palladia is even worth it.
dr. D do you know of any vet in san francisco bayarea that has a lot of experience with undifferentiated nasal carcinoma?
3 days ago i had to euthanize my 13 year old boxer for a osteosarcoma on his ribcage. Would Palladia have been helpful for this and what are the steps to take in early care for the next boxer I get to try and ward off future cancer issues?
Hi Todd,
Sorry for your loss. I lost my dog two months ago to Osteo of the pelvic bone and frankly speaking it seems just like yesterday, I guess it always will. I like you am keen to know Dr D’s response to both your questions, though Palladia is for mast-cell tumours and people’s response has been a mixed bag ( not too enthusiastic ). I don’t think we have control over the genetic factors but yes we can exercise some control over environmental factors and a lot of control over dietary factors. A proper and balanced diet I guess goes a long way in helping to keep a check on negative processes within the body, maintain acid-alkaly balance, protect DNA-damage and inhibit unproliferated cell growth. I hope what I have mentioned is right and if not Dr Dressler would surely correct me. I learnt a lot of these from here itself as also from other sources but couldn’t fully apply them for various reasons.
Dear Priscilla, there are a number of oncologists in the bay area. There is no subspecialist in nasal carcinoma to my knowledge. I have had numerous conversations with Dr. Aarti Sabhlok in SF.
Have you done a treatment plan analysis discussed in the Guide?
Be in touch
Best,
Dr. D
Dear Todd,
So sorry to hear about your old friend.
I do not believe there are publications at this time suggesting Palladia’s efficacy for osteosarcoma, but oncologists are trying out different protocols with Palladia, so we may hear more in the future.
There is a short answer and a very long answer to your question. The short answer is:
a. get a dog without known genetic factors setting up cancers (Boxers are known for this)
b. feed a diet with limited carbohydrates (lots of them now) cooked at low temperatures
c. supplement with additional omega 3 fatty acid
http://www.dogcancerblog.com/the-inflammatory-diet-and-cancer/
d. maintain regular (daily) exercise (heavy panting)
e. social interactions daily if possible for your dog
f. sleep in total darkness
g. add the vegetables in the dog cancer diet (free pdf on blog home page)
h. i suggest to my clients to routinely supplement with apocaps at 1/4 labeled doses for senior dogs without cancer (www.apocaps.com)
g. direct sunlight 10 minutes 3 times weekly
h. do not over vaccinate
i. avoid carcinogen exposure when possible
these are some initial thoughts…more in the Guide (www.dogcancersurvival.com).
Best,
Dr D
← Previous Comments